Geforce Gtx 1080 Vs 1080 Ti
Price at present 422$ Games supported 100% Price now 457$ Games supported 100% Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other full general parameters. Value for money To go the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General functioning parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of operation, but for precise assessment you lot accept to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other reckoner components. Useful when choosing a future figurer configuration or upgrading an existing ane. For desktop video cards it'southward interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (ability supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, motorcoach, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, information in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may alter the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This data will show useful if y'all need some particular applied science for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Notation that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, only if you notice some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we commonly fix bug quickly. This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing iv split up benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark past Futuremark. It used four tests based on 2 scenes, one beingness few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abased temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark eleven is now superseded by Fourth dimension Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Deject Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 characteristic level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. But like Ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Dark Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features 2 divide tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: fourteen% Geekbench v is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Grouping. Benchmark coverage: 9% Ice Tempest Graphics is an obsolete criterion, part of 3DMark suite. Water ice Tempest was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets operation. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level nine to display a battle between two space fleets virtually a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: viii% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Criterion coverage: v% Geekbench v is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from eleven dissimilar test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on straight usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: v% This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in 6 different modes. Criterion coverage: ii% Cryptocurrency mining operation of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce GTX 1080. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Let's see how skillful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming criterion results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games beyond unlike resolutions: +8.7% −8.seven% +nineteen.ii% −19.2% +0% +0% −116% +116% +19.2% −19.2% +1.seven% −1.7% −6.7% +half-dozen.vii% +five% −five% +19.2% −xix.2% +nineteen.2% −xix.ii% −54.8% +54.eight% +11.1% −11.1% +19.2% −xix.ii% +8.4% −eight.4% +19.2% −19.two% +8.5% −eight.5% −85.2% +85.2% +19.2% −nineteen.two% +3.5% −3.v% −5.9% +5.9% +5.8% −5.viii% +nineteen.2% −19.ii% +nineteen.2% −19.2% +21.6% −21.half dozen% +22.6% −22.6% +xv.3% −15.iii% −19.4% +nineteen.4% +xix.2% −19.two% +12.7% −12.7% +nineteen.2% −19.2% +21.1% −21.1% +19.2% −xix.2% +4.8% −four.8% −4.3% +4.3% +7.one% −7.1% +21% −21% +19.two% −19.2% +23% −23% +19.2% −19.ii% +19.2% −19.2% +24.4% −24.4% +17.1% −17.1% +14.1% −xiv.1% +26.5% −26.v% +19.two% −xix.2% +20.iv% −20.iv% +nineteen.two% −xix.two% +26% −26% +seven.3% −7.3% +9.vii% −nine.seven% +19.2% −nineteen.2% +23.8% −23.8% +19.2% −19.2% +xix.2% −19.2% +25% −25% +28.half dozen% −28.6% +28.ane% −28.1% +28.6% −28.half dozen% +21.ii% −21.ii% +19.2% −nineteen.2% +32.ane% −32.ane% +19.2% −xix.2% +31% −31% +21.3% −21.3% +15.4% −xv.4% +nineteen.2% −19.2% Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti since it shows better performance. Should you notwithstanding take questions apropos selection between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do yous call up we are correct or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics carte. The nearest GeForce GTX 1080 Ti's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6700, which is faster past 2% and higher by four positions in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: The nearest GeForce GTX 1080's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6600 XT, which is faster by four% and higher by 4 positions in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1080: Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Hither you lot can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of i to 5: Hither yous can ask a question about this comparing, concord or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS1080 Ti vs 1080
Full general info
Place in performance rating 38 65 Value for money 39.57 27.16 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Pascal (2016−2021) GPU lawmaking name GP102 Pascal GP104 Marketplace segment Desktop Desktop Release date 28 February 2017 (5 years agone) vi May 2016 (6 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $699 $599 Current cost $422 (0.6x MSRP) $457 (0.8x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 3584 2560 CUDA cores no data 2560 Core clock speed 1481 MHz 1607 MHz Boost clock speed 1600 MHz 1733 MHz Number of transistors 11,800 million 7,200 million Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 16 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 250 Watt 180 Watt Maximum GPU temperature 91 °C 94 °C Texture fill rate 354.four 277.3 Floating-point performance 11,340 gflops viii,873 gflops Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Passenger vehicle support no data PCIe 3.0 Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 10.v" (26.7 cm) 10.5" (26.seven cm) Height no data 4.376" (xi.i cm) Width 2-slot 2-slot Recommended system ability (PSU) 600 Watt 500 Watt Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin 8-pin SLI options + + Memory
Memory type GDDR5X GDDR5 Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 8 GB Memory bus width 352 Flake 256 Chip Memory clock speed 11000 MHz 10 GB/s Memory bandwidth 484.iv GB/due south 320 GB/south Shared retentiveness - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort DP 1.42, HDMI two.0b, DL-DVI Multi monitor support + + HDMI + + Thou-SYNC support + + Technologies
GPU Boost 3.0 3.0 VR Ready no data + Ansel + + API support
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1) Shader Model half-dozen.iv half-dozen.iv OpenGL 4.5 4.5 OpenCL ane.2 ane.two Vulkan + 1.two.131 CUDA + + Criterion performance
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 1427 Mh/s 1045 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) 4.6 Gh/due south three.09 Gh/southward Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 35 Mh/s 27.63 Mh/s Siacoin / SC (Sia) 2.96 Gh/southward two.28 Gh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.76 kh/s 0.48 kh/southward Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 630 Sol/due south 470 Sol/s Gaming performance
Full HD 131 129 1440p 89 80 4K 68 59
Low Preset
Medium Preset
Loftier Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 sixty−65 50−55
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100 92 Assassin's Creed Valhalla threescore−65 50−55 Battleground 5 166 166 Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 60−65 134 Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 l−55 Far Cry 5 120 118 Far Cry New Dawn 104 111 Forza Horizon 4 147 140 Hitman 3 60−65 50−55 Horizon Naught Dawn 60−65 50−55 Ruby Dead Redemption ii lx−65 96 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120 108 Sentry Dogs: Legion threescore−65 50−55
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey ninety 83 Assassin's Creed Valhalla sixty−65 50−55 Battlefield v 154 142 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 61 113 Cyberpunk 2077 lx−65 50−55 Far Cry 5 117 113 Far Cry New Dawn 102 108 Forza Horizon iv 145 137 Hitman 3 sixty−65 fifty−55 Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 50−55 Metro Exodus xc 74 Red Dead Redemption two 65 53 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 113 98 The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 60−65 74 Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 50−55
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 71 63 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65 fifty−55 Battleground 5 149 123 Cyberpunk 2077 threescore−65 50−55 Far Cry 5 109 104 Far Weep New Dawn 94 98 Forza Horizon 4 120 112 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 98 81 Spotter Dogs: Legion 60−65 50−55
Telephone call of Duty: Mod Warfare 91 74 Hitman 3 sixty−65 50−55 Horizon Zero Dawn sixty−65 l−55 Metro Exodus 56 45 Cherry Dead Redemption 2 41 35 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73 64
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 62 49 Assassin's Creed Valhalla threescore−65 l−55 Battlefield five 118 98 Cyberpunk 2077 sixty−65 50−55 Far Cry 5 97 77 Far Cry New Dawn 88 82 Forza Horizon 4 102 93 Picket Dogs: Legion 60−65 l−55
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52 42 Hitman 3 lx−65 50−55 Horizon Cypher Dawn sixty−65 50−55 Metro Exodus 35 28 Red Expressionless Redemption ii 27 21 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 41 32 The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 72 56
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey forty 33 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla threescore−65 50−55 Battlefield five seventy 53 Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 fifty−55 Far Weep 5 55 42 Far Cry New Dawn 57 47 Forza Horizon 4 75 65 Sentry Dogs: Legion threescore−65 50−55 Advantages and disadvantages
Operation rating 61.71 51.42 Novelty 28 February 2017 6 May 2016 Cost $699 $599 Memory bus width 352 256 Pipelines / CUDA cores 3584 2560 Memory bandwidth 484.iv 320 Thermal design power (TDP) 250 Watt 180 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti by AMD
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1080 by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1080-Ti-vs-GeForce-GTX-1080
0 Response to "Geforce Gtx 1080 Vs 1080 Ti"
Post a Comment