Geforce Gtx 1080 Vs 1080 Ti
1080 Ti vs 1080
Price at present 422$
Games supported 100%
Price now 457$
Games supported 100%
Full general info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other full general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 38 | 65 |
| Value for money | 39.57 | 27.16 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU lawmaking name | GP102 | Pascal GP104 |
| Marketplace segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 February 2017 (5 years agone) | vi May 2016 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $599 |
| Current cost | $422 (0.6x MSRP) | $457 (0.8x MSRP) |
Value for money
To go the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
Technical specs
General functioning parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of operation, but for precise assessment you lot accept to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | 2560 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 11,800 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | 94 °C |
| Texture fill rate | 354.four | 277.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | viii,873 gflops |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other reckoner components. Useful when choosing a future figurer configuration or upgrading an existing ane. For desktop video cards it'southward interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (ability supply compatibility).
| Passenger vehicle support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.v" (26.7 cm) | 10.5" (26.seven cm) |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (xi.i cm) |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Recommended system ability (PSU) | 600 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | + |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, motorcoach, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 352 Flake | 256 Chip |
| Memory clock speed | 11000 MHz | 10 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 484.iv GB/due south | 320 GB/south |
| Shared retentiveness | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, information in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may alter the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI two.0b, DL-DVI |
| Multi monitor support | + | + |
| HDMI | + | + |
| Thou-SYNC support | + | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This data will show useful if y'all need some particular applied science for your purposes.
| GPU Boost | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| VR Ready | no data | + |
| Ansel | + | + |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | half-dozen.iv | half-dozen.iv |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | ane.2 | ane.two |
| Vulkan | + | 1.two.131 |
| CUDA | + | + |
Criterion performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Notation that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, only if you notice some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we commonly fix bug quickly.
- Passmark
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Burn down Strike Graphics
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
- GeekBench 5 Vulkan
- GeekBench 5 CUDA
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
- SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
- SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
- SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
- SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
- SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing iv split up benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Criterion coverage: 25%
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark past Futuremark. It used four tests based on 2 scenes, one beingness few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abased temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark eleven is now superseded by Fourth dimension Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Deject Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 characteristic level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. But like Ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Dark Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features 2 divide tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: fourteen%
Geekbench v is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Grouping.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
Ice Tempest Graphics is an obsolete criterion, part of 3DMark suite. Water ice Tempest was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets operation. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level nine to display a battle between two space fleets virtually a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: viii%
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Criterion coverage: v%
Geekbench v is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from eleven dissimilar test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on straight usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: v%
This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in 6 different modes.
Criterion coverage: ii%
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining operation of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce GTX 1080. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 1427 Mh/s | 1045 Mh/s |
| Decred / DCR (Decred) | 4.6 Gh/due south | three.09 Gh/southward |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 35 Mh/s | 27.63 Mh/s |
| Siacoin / SC (Sia) | 2.96 Gh/southward | two.28 Gh/s |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.76 kh/s | 0.48 kh/southward |
| Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 630 Sol/due south | 470 Sol/s |
Gaming performance
Let's see how skillful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming criterion results are measured in FPS.
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games beyond unlike resolutions:
| Full HD | 131 | 129 |
| 1440p | 89 | 80 |
| 4K | 68 | 59 |
- Total Hd
Low Preset - Full Hard disk drive
Medium Preset - Full HD
Loftier Preset - Full Hd
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4KHigh Preset
- 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | sixty−65 | 50−55 |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 100 +8.7% | 92 −8.seven% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | threescore−65 +nineteen.ii% | 50−55 −19.2% |
| Battleground 5 | 166 +0% | 166 +0% |
| Call of Duty: Mod Warfare | 60−65 −116% | 134 +116% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65 +19.2% | l−55 −19.2% |
| Far Cry 5 | 120 +1.seven% | 118 −1.7% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 104 −6.7% | 111 +half-dozen.vii% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 147 +five% | 140 −five% |
| Hitman 3 | 60−65 +19.2% | 50−55 −xix.2% |
| Horizon Naught Dawn | 60−65 +nineteen.2% | 50−55 −xix.ii% |
| Ruby Dead Redemption ii | lx−65 −54.8% | 96 +54.eight% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 120 +11.1% | 108 −11.1% |
| Sentry Dogs: Legion | threescore−65 +19.2% | 50−55 −xix.ii% |
| Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey | ninety +8.4% | 83 −eight.4% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | sixty−65 +19.2% | 50−55 −19.two% |
| Battlefield v | 154 +8.5% | 142 −eight.5% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 61 −85.2% | 113 +85.2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | lx−65 +19.2% | 50−55 −nineteen.two% |
| Far Cry 5 | 117 +3.5% | 113 −3.v% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 102 −5.9% | 108 +5.9% |
| Forza Horizon iv | 145 +5.8% | 137 −5.viii% |
| Hitman 3 | sixty−65 +nineteen.2% | fifty−55 −19.ii% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 60−65 +nineteen.2% | 50−55 −19.2% |
| Metro Exodus | xc +21.6% | 74 −21.half dozen% |
| Red Dead Redemption two | 65 +22.6% | 53 −22.6% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 113 +xv.3% | 98 −15.iii% |
| The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt | 60−65 −19.4% | 74 +nineteen.4% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65 +xix.2% | 50−55 −19.two% |
| Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey | 71 +12.7% | 63 −12.7% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 60−65 +nineteen.2% | fifty−55 −19.2% |
| Battleground 5 | 149 +21.1% | 123 −21.1% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | threescore−65 +19.2% | 50−55 −xix.2% |
| Far Cry 5 | 109 +4.8% | 104 −four.8% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 94 −4.3% | 98 +4.3% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120 +7.one% | 112 −7.1% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Chase | 98 +21% | 81 −21% |
| Spotter Dogs: Legion | 60−65 +19.two% | 50−55 −19.2% |
| Telephone call of Duty: Mod Warfare | 91 +23% | 74 −23% |
| Hitman 3 | sixty−65 +19.2% | 50−55 −19.ii% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | sixty−65 +19.2% | l−55 −19.2% |
| Metro Exodus | 56 +24.4% | 45 −24.4% |
| Cherry Dead Redemption 2 | 41 +17.1% | 35 −17.1% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 73 +14.1% | 64 −xiv.1% |
| Assassin'south Creed Odyssey | 62 +26.5% | 49 −26.v% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | threescore−65 +19.two% | l−55 −xix.2% |
| Battlefield five | 118 +20.iv% | 98 −20.iv% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | sixty−65 +nineteen.two% | 50−55 −xix.two% |
| Far Cry 5 | 97 +26% | 77 −26% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 88 +seven.3% | 82 −7.3% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 102 +9.vii% | 93 −nine.seven% |
| Picket Dogs: Legion | 60−65 +19.2% | l−55 −nineteen.2% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 52 +23.8% | 42 −23.8% |
| Hitman 3 | lx−65 +19.2% | 50−55 −19.2% |
| Horizon Cypher Dawn | sixty−65 +xix.2% | 50−55 −19.2% |
| Metro Exodus | 35 +25% | 28 −25% |
| Red Expressionless Redemption ii | 27 +28.half dozen% | 21 −28.6% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 41 +28.ane% | 32 −28.1% |
| The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt | 72 +28.6% | 56 −28.half dozen% |
| Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey | forty +21.ii% | 33 −21.ii% |
| Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla | threescore−65 +19.2% | 50−55 −nineteen.2% |
| Battlefield five | seventy +32.ane% | 53 −32.ane% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65 +19.2% | fifty−55 −xix.2% |
| Far Weep 5 | 55 +31% | 42 −31% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 57 +21.3% | 47 −21.3% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75 +15.4% | 65 −xv.4% |
| Sentry Dogs: Legion | threescore−65 +nineteen.2% | 50−55 −19.2% |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Operation rating | 61.71 | 51.42 |
| Novelty | 28 February 2017 | 6 May 2016 |
| Cost | $699 | $599 |
| Memory bus width | 352 | 256 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | 2560 |
| Memory bandwidth | 484.iv | 320 |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 180 Watt |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
since it shows better performance.
Should you notwithstanding take questions apropos selection between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your vote
Do yous call up we are correct or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics carte.
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti by AMD
The nearest GeForce GTX 1080 Ti's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6700, which is faster past 2% and higher by four positions in our rating.
Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti:
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1080 by AMD
The nearest GeForce GTX 1080's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6600 XT, which is faster by four% and higher by 4 positions in our rating.
Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1080:
Similar GPU comparisons
Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User rating
Hither you lot can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:
Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of i to 5:
Questions and comments
Hither yous can ask a question about this comparing, concord or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1080-Ti-vs-GeForce-GTX-1080
0 Response to "Geforce Gtx 1080 Vs 1080 Ti"
Post a Comment